|
An Examination of the Question Where the Ruling Principle is to Be Considered to Reside; Wherein Also is a Discussion of Tears and Laughter, and a Physiological Speculation as to the Inter-Relation of Matter, Nature, and Minds
Patrologia Graeca 44.156-164 * Greek Fonts
We have, however, discussed these points in passing, as following on
our argument, since they were introduced by our speculation on the
point before us; for the subject of enquiry was, whether the
intellectual faculty has its seat in any of the parts of us, or
extends equally over them all; for as for those who shut up the mind
locally in parts of the body, and who advance for the establishment of
this opinion of theirs the fact that the reason has not free course in
the case of those whose cerebral membranes are in an unnatural
condition, our argument showed that in respect of every part of the
compound nature of man, whereby every man has some natural operation,
the power of the soul remains equally ineffective if the part does not
continue in its natural condition. And thus there came into our
argument, following out this line of thought, the view we have just
stated, by which we learn that in the compound nature of man the mind
is governed by God, and that by it is governed our material life,
provided the latter remains in its natural state, but if it is
perverted from nature it is alienated also from that operation which
is carried on by the mind. |
Ἀλλὰ ταῦτα μὲν ἡμῖν ἐξ ἀκολουθίας τινὸς παρεξητάσθη͵ διὰ τῆς εἰς τὸ προκείμενον θεωρίας ἐπεισελθόντα. Τὸ γὰρ ζητούμενον ἦν͵ εἰ ἐν μέρει τινὶ τῶν ἐν ἡμῖν ἡ νοερὰ καθίδρυται δύναμις ἢ διὰ πάντων κατὰ τὸ ἴσον διήκει. Τῶν γὰρ τοπικοῖς μέρεσι περιειργόντων τὸν νοῦν καὶ εἰς σύστασιν τῆς τοιαύτης αὐτῶν ὑπολήψεως προφερόντων͵ τὸ μὴ εὐοδοῦσθαι τὴν διάνοιαν ἐπὶ τῶν παρὰ φύσιν διακειμένων τὰς μήνιγγας, ἀπέδειξεν ὁ λόγος͵ ὅτι κατὰ πᾶν μέρος τοῦ ἀνθρωπίνου συγκρίματος͵ καθ' ὃ πέφυκεν ἕκαστος ἐνεργεῖν͵ ἴσως ἡ τῆς ψυχῆς δύναμις ἀνενέργητος μένει͵ μὴ διαμένοντος ἐν τῇ φύσει τοῦ μέρους. Καὶ διὰ τοῦτο ἐξ ἀκολουθίας τὸ προτεθὲν παρενέπεσε τῷ λόγῳ θεώρημα͵ δι' οὗ μανθάνομεν͵ ἐν τῷ ἀνθρωπίνῳ συγκρίματι ὑπὸ Θεοῦ μὲν διοικεῖσθαι τὸν νοῦν͵ ὑπ' ἐκείνου δὲ τὴν ὑλικὴν ἡμῶν ζωὴν͵ ὅταν ἐν τῇ φύσει μένῃ͵ εἰ δὲ παρατραπείη τῆς φύσεως, καὶ τῆς κατὰ τὸν νοῦν ἐνεργείας ἀλλοτριοῦσθαι.Ἀλλ' ἐπανέλθωμεν πάλιν ὅθεν ἐξέβημεν͵ ὅτι ἐπὶ τῶν μὴ παρατραπέντων ἐκ πάθους τινὸς τῆς φυσικῆς καταστάσεως τὴν οἰκείαν δύναμιν ὁ νοῦς ἐνεργεῖ͵ καὶ ἔῤῥωται μὲν ἐπὶ τῶν συνεστώτων͵ ἀδυνατεῖ δὲ πάλιν ἐπὶ τῶν μὴ χωρούντων αὐτοῦ τὴν ἐνέργειαν. Ἔστι γὰρ καὶ δι' ἑτέρων τὸ περὶ τούτων δόγμα πιστώσασθαι, καὶ εἰ μὴ βαρὺ τῇ ἀκοῇ τῶν προκεκμηκότων ἤδη τῷ λόγῳ͵ καὶ περὶ τούτων͵ ὡς ἂν οἷοί τε ὦμεν͵ δι' ὀλίγων διαληψώμεθα. |
Previous chapter * Index * Next chapter
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/physis/nyssa-man/12.asp?pg=9