SUCH, then, is the formidable fact of our times, described without any
concealment of the brutality of its features. It is, furthermore, entirely new
in the history of our modern civilisation. Never, in the course of its
development, has anything similar happened. If we wish to find its like we shall
have to take a leap outside our modern history and immerse ourselves in a world,
a vital element, entirely different from our own; we shall have to penetrate the
ancient world till we reach the hour of its decline. The history of the Roman
Empire is also the history of the uprising of the Empire of the Masses, who
absorb and annul the directing minorities and put themselves in their place.
Then, also, is produced the phenomenon of agglomeration, of "the
full." For that reason, as Spengler has very well observed, it was
necessary, just as in our day, to construct enormous buildings. The epoch of the
masses is the epoch of the colossal.[1]We are living, then, under the
brutal empire of the masses. just so; I have now twice called this empire
"brutal," and have thus paid my tribute to the god of the commonplace.
Now, ticket in hand, I can cheerfully enter into my subject, see the show from
inside. Or perhaps it was thought that I was going to be satisfied with that
description, possibly exact, but quite external; the mere features, the aspect
under which this tremendous fact presents itself when looked at from the
view-point of the past? If I were to leave the matter here and strangle off my
present essay without more ado, the reader would be left thinking, and quite
justly, that this fabulous uprising of the masses above the surface of history
inspired me merely with a few petulant, disdainful words, a certain amount of
hatred and a certain amount of disgust. This all the more in my case, when it is
well known that I uphold a radically aristocratic interpretation of history.
Radically, because I have never said that human society ought to be
aristocratic, but a great deal more than that. What I have said, and still
believe with ever-increasing conviction, is that human society is always,
whether it will or no, aristocratic by its very essence, to the extreme that it
is a society in the measure that it is aristocratic, and ceases to be such when
it ceases to be aristocratic.
[1]The tragic
thing about this process is that while these agglomerations were in
formation there was beginning that depopulation of the countryside which was
to result in an absolute decrease of the number of inhabitants in the
Empire.