If we study the historical situation immediately preceding the birth of a
State, we shall always discover the following lines of development. Various
small groups exist, whose social structure is designed so that each may live
within itself. The social form of each serves only for an "internal"
existence in common. This indicates that in the past they did actually live in
isolation, each by itself and for itself, without other than occasional contacts
with its neighbours. But to this effective isolation there has succeeded an
"external" common life, above all in the economic sphere. The
individual in each group no longer lives only in his own circle, part of his
life is linked up with individuals of other groups, with whom he is in
commercial or intellectual relations. Hence arises a disequilibrium between the
two common existences, the "internal" and the "external ."
Established social forms- laws, customs, religion- favour the internal and make
difficult the external which is a newer, ampler existence. In this situation,
the State-principle is the movement which tends to annihilate the social forms
of internal existence, and to substitute for them a social form adequate to the
new life, lived externally. Apply this to actual conditions in Europe, and these
abstract expressions will take on form and colour. There
is no possible creation of a State unless the minds of certain peoples are
capable of abandoning the traditional structure of one form of common life, and
in addition, of thinking out another form not previously existing. That is why
it is a genuine creation. The State begins by being absolutely a work of
imagination. Imagination is the liberating power possessed by man. A people is
capable of becoming a State in the degree in which it is able to imagine. Hence
it is, that with all peoples there has been a limit to their evolution in the
direction of a State; precisely the limit set by Nature to their imaginations. The Greek and the Roman, capable of imagining the city which
triumphs over the dispersiveness of the countryside, stopped short at the city
walls. There were men who attempted to carry Graeco-Roman minds further, to set
them free from the city, but it was a vain enterprise. The imaginative
limitations of the Roman, represented by Brutus, took in hand the assassination
of Caesar, the greatest imagination of antiquity. It is of importance to us
Europeans of to-day to recall this story, for ours has reached the same chapter.
-