NATURE is always with us. It is self-supporting. In the forests of Nature
we can be savages with impunity. We can likewise resolve never to cease being
so, without further risk than the coming of other peoples who are not savages.
But, in principle, it is possible to have peoples who are perennially primitive.
Breyssig has called these "the peoples of perpetual dawn," those who
have remained in a motionless, frozen twilight, which never progresses towards
midday. This is what happens in the
world which is mere Nature. But it does not happen in the world of civilisation
which is ours. Civilisation is not "just there," it is not
self-supporting. It is artificial and requires the artist or the artisan. If you
want to make use of the advantages of civilisation, but are not prepared to
concern yourself with the upholding of civilisation- you are done. In a trice
you find yourself left without civilisation. Just a slip, and when you look
around everything has vanished into air. The primitive forest appears in its
native state, just as if curtains covering pure Nature had been drawn back. The
jungle is always primitive and, vice versa, everything primitive is mere jungle.
The romantics of every period have
been excited by those scenes of violation, in which the natural and infrahuman
assaults the white form of woman, and they have depicted Leda and the swan,
Pasiphae and the bull, Antiope and the goat. Generalising the picture, they have
found a more subtly indecent spectacle in the landscape with ruins, where the
civilised, geometric stone is stifled beneath the embrace of wild vegetation.
When your good romantic catches sight of a building, the first thing his eyes
seek is the yellow hedge-mustard on cornice and roof. This proclaims, that in
the long run, everything is earth, that the jungle springs up everywhere anew.
It would be stupid to laugh at the romantic. The romantic also is in the right.
Under these innocently perverse images there lies an immense, ever-present
problem: that of the relations between civilisation and what lies behind it-
Nature, between the rational and the cosmic. I reserve, then, the right to deal
with this subject on another occasion and to be a romantic myself at an
opportune moment. But just now I am engaged in a contrary task. It is a question
of keeping back the invading jungle. The "good European" must at
present busy himself with something similar to what caused grave concern to the
Australian states: how to prevent the prickly-pear from gaining ground and
driving man into the sea.