|
Plato : SOPHIST
Persons of the dialogue: Theodorus - Theaetetus - Socrates - an Eleatic stranger = Note by Elpenor |
77 Pages
Page 41
Str. But that of which this is the condition cannot be absolute unity?
Theaet. Why not?
Str. Because, according to right reason, that which is truly one must be affirmed to be absolutely indivisible.
Theaet. Certainly.
Str. But this indivisible, if made up of many parts, will contradict reason.
Theaet. I understand.
Str. Shall we say that being is one and a whole, because it has the attribute of unity? Or shall we say that being is not a whole at all?
Theaet. That is a hard alternative to offer.
Str. Most true; for being, having in a certain sense the attribute of one, is yet proved not to be the same as one, and the all is therefore more than one.
Theaet. Yes.
Str. And yet if being be not a whole, through having the attribute of unity, and there be such a thing as an absolute whole, being lacks something of its own nature?
Theaet. Certainly.
Str. Upon this view, again, being, having a defect of being, will become not - being?
Theaet. True.
Str. And, again, the all becomes more than one, for being and the whole will each have their separate nature.
Theaet. Yes.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-sophist.asp?pg=41
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -