|
Plato : SOPHIST
Persons of the dialogue: Theodorus - Theaetetus - Socrates - an Eleatic stranger = Note by Elpenor |
77 Pages
Page 40
Str. And equally irrational to admit that a name is anything?
Theaet. How so?
Str. To distinguish the name from the thing, implies duality.
Theaet. Yes.
Str. And yet he who identifies the name with the thing will be compelled to say that it is the name of nothing, or if he says that it is the name of something, even then the name will only be the name of a name, and of nothing else.
Theaet. True.
Str. And the one will turn out to be only one of one, and being absolute unity, will represent a mere name.
Theaet. Certainly.
Str. And would they say that the whole is other than the one that is, or the same with it?
Theaet. To be sure they would, and they actually say so.
Str. If being is a whole, as Parmenides sings, - -
Every way like unto the fullness of a well - rounded sphere,
Evenly balanced from the centre on every side,
And must needs be neither greater nor less in any way,
Neither on this side nor on that - - then being has a centre and extremes, and, having these, must also have parts.
Theaet. True.
Str. Yet that which has parts may have the attribute of unity in all the parts, and in this way being all and a whole, may be one?
Theaet. Certainly.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-sophist.asp?pg=40
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -