|
Plato : SOPHIST
Persons of the dialogue: Theodorus - Theaetetus - Socrates - an Eleatic stranger = Note by Elpenor |
77 Pages
Page 31
Str. To that which is, may be attributed some other thing which is? Theaet. Certainly.
Str. But can anything which is, be attributed to that which is not? Theaet. Impossible.
Str. And all number is to be reckoned among things which are?
Theaet. Yes, surely number, if anything, has a real existence.
Str. Then we must not attempt to attribute to not - being number either in the singular or plural?
Theaet. The argument implies that we should be wrong in doing so.
Str. But how can a man either express in words or even conceive in thought things which are not or a thing which is not without number?
Theaet. How indeed?
Str. When we speak of things which are not attributing plurality to not - being?
Theaet. Certainly.
Str. But, on the other hand, when we say "what is not," do we not attribute unity?
Theaet. Manifestly.
Str. Nevertheless, we maintain that you may not and ought not to attribute being to not - being?
Theaet. Most true.
Str. Do you see, then, that not - being in itself can neither be spoken, uttered, or thought, but that it is unthinkable, unutterable, unspeakable, indescribable?
Theaet. Quite true.
Str. But, if so, I was wrong in telling you just now that the difficulty which was coming is the greatest of all.
Theaet. What! is there a greater still behind?
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-sophist.asp?pg=31
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -