|
Plato : SOPHIST
Persons of the dialogue: Theodorus - Theaetetus - Socrates - an Eleatic stranger = Note by Elpenor |
77 Pages
Page 30
Str. Let us be serious then, and consider the question neither in strife nor play: suppose that one of the hearers of Parmenides was asked, "To is the term 'not - being' to be applied?" - do you know what sort of object he would single out in reply, and what answer he would make to the enquirer?
Theaet. That is a difficult question, and one not to be answered at all by a person like myself.
Str. There is at any rate no difficulty in seeing that the predicate "not - being" is not applicable to any being.
Theaet. None, certainly.
Str. And if not to being, then not to something.
Theaet. Of course not.
Str. It is also plain, that in speaking of something we speak of being, for to speak of an abstract something naked and isolated from all being is impossible.
Theaet. Impossible.
Str. You mean by assenting to imply that he who says something must say some one thing?
Theaet. Yes.
Str. Some in the singular (ti) you would say is the sign of one, some in the dual (tine) of two, some in the plural (tines) of many?
Theaet. Exactly.
Str. Then he who says "not something" must say absolutely nothing.
Theaet. Most assuredly.
Str. And as we cannot admit that a man speaks and says nothing, he who says "not - being" does not speak at all.
Theaet. The difficulty of the argument can no further go.
Str. Not yet, my friend, is the time for such a word; for there still remains of all perplexities the first and greatest, touching the very foundation of the matter.
Theaet. What do you mean? Do not be afraid to speak.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-sophist.asp?pg=30
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -