|
Plato : PHILEBUS
Persons of the dialogue: Socrates - Protarchus - Philebus = Note by Elpenor |
79 Pages
Page 37
Soc. Shall the enquiry into these states of feeling be made the occasion of raising a question?
Pro. What question?
Soc. Whether we ought to say that the pleasures and pains of which we are speaking are true or false? or some true and some false?
Pro. But how, Socrates, can there be false pleasures and pains?
Soc. And how, Protarchus, can there be true and false fears, or true and false expectations, or true and false opinions?
Pro. I grant that opinions may be true or false, but not pleasures. Soc. What do you mean? I am afraid that we are raising a very serious enquiry.
Pro. There I agree.
Soc. And yet, my boy, for you are one of Philebus' boys, the point to be considered, is, whether the enquiry is relevant to the argument. Pro. Surely.
Soc. No tedious and irrelevant discussion can be allowed; what is said should be pertinent.
Pro. Right.
Soc. I am always wondering at the question which has now been raised.
Pro. How so?
Soc. Do you deny that some pleasures are false, and others true?
Pro. To be sure I do.
Soc. Would you say that no one ever seemed to rejoice and yet did not rejoice, or seemed to feel pain and yet did not feel pain, sleeping or waking, mad or lunatic?
Pro. So we have always held, Socrates.
Soc. But were you right? Shall we enquire into the truth of your opinion?
Pro. I think that we should.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-philebus.asp?pg=37
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -