|
Plato : PHILEBUS
Persons of the dialogue: Socrates - Protarchus - Philebus = Note by Elpenor |
79 Pages
Page 33
Soc. And memory may, I think, be rightly described as the preservation of consciousness?
Pro. Right.
Soc. But do we not distinguish memory from recollection?
Pro. I think so.
Soc. And do we not mean by recollection the power which the soul has of recovering, when by herself, some feeling which she experienced when in company with the body?
Pro. Certainly.
Soc. And when she recovers of herself the lost recollection of some consciousness or knowledge, the recovery is termed recollection and reminiscence?
Pro. Very true.
Soc. There is a reason why I say all this.
Pro. What is it?
Soc. I want to attain the plainest possible notion of pleasure and desire, as they exist in the mind only, apart from the body; and the previous analysis helps to show the nature of both.
Pro. Then now, Socrates, let us proceed to the next point.
Soc. There are certainly many things to be considered in discussing the generation and whole complexion of pleasure. At the outset we must determine the nature and seat of desire.
Pro. Ay; let us enquire into that, for we shall lose nothing.
Soc. Nay, Protarchus, we shall surely lose the puzzle if we find the answer.
Pro. A fair retort; but let us proceed.
Soc. Did we not place hunger, thirst, and the like, in the class of desires?
Pro. Certainly.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-philebus.asp?pg=33
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -