|
Plato : PHILEBUS
Persons of the dialogue: Socrates - Protarchus - Philebus = Note by Elpenor |
79 Pages
Page 32
Soc. The other class of pleasures, which as we were saying is purely mental, is entirely derived from memory.
Pro. What do you mean?
Soc. I must first of all analyse memory, or rather perception which is prior to, memory, if the subject of our discussion is ever to be properly cleared up.
Pro. How will you proceed?
Soc. Let us imagine affections of the body which are extinguished before they reach the soul, and leave her unaffected; and again, other affections which vibrate through both soul and body, and impart a shock to both and to each of them.
Pro. Granted.
Soc. And the soul may be truly said to be oblivious of the first but not of the second?
Pro. Quite true.
Soc. When I say oblivious, do not suppose that I mean forgetfulness in a literal sense; for forgetfulness is the exit of memory, which in this case has not yet entered; and to speak of the loss of that which is not yet in existence, and never has been, is a contradiction; do you see?
Pro. Yes.
Soc. Then just be so good as to change the terms.
Pro. How shall I change them?
Soc. Instead of the oblivion of the soul, when you are describing the state in which she is unaffected by the shocks of the body, say unconsciousness.
Pro. I see.
Soc. And the union or communion of soul and body in one feeling and motion would be properly called consciousness?
Pro. Most true.
Soc. Then now we know the meaning of the word?
Pro. Yes.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-philebus.asp?pg=32
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -