He was savage in his criticism of other writers, even the greatest.
Homer, he said, and
Archilochus too, deserved to
be hooted from the platform and thrashed. Even the main purport of his
writings was differently interpreted. Some named his work ‘The Muses,’ as
though it were chiefly a poetic vision; others named it ‘The sure Steersman
to the Goal of Life’; others, more prosaically, ‘A Treatise of Nature.’
The fundamental principle or fact of being Heraclitus formulated in the
famous dictum, ‘All things pass.’ In the eternal flux or flow of being
consisted its reality; even as in a river the water is ever changing, and
the river exists as a river only in virtue of this continual change; or as
in a living body, wherein while there is life there is no stability or
fixedness; stability and fixedness are the attributes of the unreal image of
life, not of life itself. Thus, as will be observed, from the material
basis of being as conceived by Thales, with only a very vague conception of the counter-principle of
movement, philosophy has wheeled round in Heraclitus to the other extreme;
he finds his permanent element in the negation of permanence; being or
reality consists in never ‘being’ but always ‘becoming,’ not in stability
but in change.