|
![]() |
Plato : PARMENIDES
Persons of the dialogue: Cephalus - Adeimantus - Glaucon -
Antiphon
|
75 Pages
Page 69
And, further, if not moved in any way, it will not be altered in any way?
No.
Then, in so far as the one that is not is moved, it is altered, but in so far as it is not moved, it is not altered?
Right.
Then the one that is not is altered and is not altered?
That is clear.
And must not that which is altered become other than it previously was, and lose its former state and be destroyed; but that which is not altered can neither come into being nor be destroyed?
Very true.
And the one that is not, being altered, becomes and is destroyed; and not being altered, neither becomes nor is destroyed; and so the one that is not becomes and is destroyed, and neither becomes nor is destroyed?
True. -
And now, let us go back once more to the beginning, and see whether these or some other consequences will follow.
Let us do as you say.
If one is not, we ask what will happen in respect of one? That is the question.
Yes.
Do not the words "is not" signify absence of being in that to which we apply them?
Just so.
And when we say that a thing is not, do we mean that it is not in one way but is in another? or do we mean, absolutely, that what is not has in no sort or way or kind participation of being?
Quite absolutely.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology
Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-Greece/plato/plato-parmenides.asp?pg=69
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -