The coronation of Otto the Great seemed to his
contemporaries a necessary and beneficial act. They still believed that the
Roman Empire was suspended, not extinct; and that now, one hundred and fifty
years after Charlemagne, the occasion was opportune to revive the name and
power associated with the golden age of the first Frankish emperor. Otto's
ardent spirit, one may well believe, was fired with this vision of imperial
sway and the renewal of a title around which clustered so many memories of
success and glory.
ULTIMATE RESULTS OF THE CORONATION
But the outcome of Otto's restoration of the Roman Empire
was good neither for Italy nor for Germany. It became the rule, henceforth,
that the man whom the German nobles chose as their king had a claim, also, to
the Italian crown and the imperial title. The efforts of the German kings to
make good this claim led to their constant interference in the affairs of
Italy. They treated that country as a conquered province which had no right to
a national life and an independent government under its own rulers. At the same
time they neglected Germany and failed to keep their powerful territorial lords
in subjection. Neither Italy nor Germany, in consequence, could become a
unified, centralized state, such as was formed in France and England during the
later Middle Ages.
THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE
The empire of Charlemagne, restored by Otto the Great,
came to be called in later centuries the "Holy Roman Empire." The
title points to the idea of a world monarchy—the Roman Empire—and a world
religion—Roman Christianity—united in one institution. This magnificent idea
was never fully realized. The popes and emperors, instead of being bound to each
other by the closest ties, were more generally enemies than friends. A large
part of medieval history was to turn on this conflict between the Empire and
the Papacy.