This aspect is not to be looked for in the scenes
of the barricades, which are mere incidents , but in the fact that it placed the
average man- the great social mass- in conditions of life radically opposed to
those by which he had always been surrounded. It turned his public existence
upside down. Revolution is not the uprising against pre-existing order, but the
setting up of a new order contradictory to the traditional one. Hence there is
no exaggeration in saying that the man who is the product of the XIXth Century
is, for the effects of public life, a man apart from all other men. The
XVIIIth-Century man differs, of course, from the XVIIth-Century man, and this
one in turn from his fellow of the XVIth Century, but they are all related,
similar, even identical in essentials when confronted with this new man. For the
"common" man of all periods "life" had principally meant
limitation, obligation, dependence; in a word, pressure. Say oppression, if you
like, provided it be understood not only in the juridical and social sense, but
also in the cosmic. For it is this latter which has never been lacking up to a
hundred years ago, the date at which starts the practically limitless expansion
of scientific technique- physical and administrative. Previously, even for the
rich and powerful, the world was a place of poverty, difficulty and danger.[1]
[1]However rich
an individual might be in relation to his fellows, as the world in its
totality was poor, the sphere of conveniences and commodities with which his
wealth furnished him was very limited. The life of the average man to-day is
easier, more convenient and safer than that of the most powerful of another
age. What difference does it make to him not to be richer than others if the
world is richer and furnishes him with magnificent roads, railway,
telegraphs, hotels, personal safety and aspirin?