|
Translated by Frederick Crombie.
This Part: 128 Pages
Page 70
21. And at the same time, it is clearly shown that, as far as regards the underlying nature, [2512] as there is one (piece of) clay which is under the hands of the potter, from which piece vessels are formed unto honour and dishonour; so the one nature of every soul being in the hands of God, and, so to speak, there being (only) one lump of reasonable beings, [2513] certain causes of more ancient date led to some being created vessels unto honour, and others vessels unto dishonour. But if the language of the apostle convey a censure when he says, "Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God?" it teaches us that he who has confidence before God, and is faithful, and has lived virtuously, would not hear the words, "Who art thou that repliest against God?" Such an one, e.g., as Moses was, "For Moses spake, and God answered him with a voice;" [2514] and as God answers Moses, so does a saint also answer God. But he who does not possess this confidence, manifestly, either because he has lost it, or because he investigates these matters not from a love of knowledge, but from a desire to find fault, [2515] and who therefore says, "Why does He yet find fault? for who hath resisted His will?" would merit the language of censure, which says, "Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God?"
[2512] hoson epi te hupokeimene phusei.
[2513] henos phuramatos ton logikon hupostaseon.
[2514] Cf. Ex. xix. 19.
[2515] kata philoneikian.
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/fathers/origen/principiis.asp?pg=70