|
Plato : SOPHIST
Persons of the dialogue: Theodorus - Theaetetus - Socrates - an Eleatic stranger = Note by Elpenor |
77 Pages
Page 72
Str. And now, since there has been shown to be false speech and false opinion, there may be imitations of real existences, and out of this condition of the mind an art of deception may arise.
Theaet. Quite possible.
Str. And we have: already admitted, in what preceded, that the Sophist was lurking in one of the divisions of the likeness - making art?
Theaet. Yes.
Str. Let us, then, renew the attempt, and in dividing any class, always take the part to the right, holding fast to that which holds the Sophist, until we have stripped him of all his common properties, and reached his difference or peculiar. Then we may exhibit him in his true nature, first to ourselves and then to kindred dialectical spirits.
Theaet. Very good.
Str. You may remember that all art was originally divided by us into creative and acquisitive.
Theaet. Yes.
Str. And the Sophist was flitting before us in the acquisitive class, in the subdivisions of hunting, contests, merchandise, and the like.
Theaet. Very true.
Str. But now that the imitative art has enclosed him, it is clear that we must begin by dividing the art of creation; for imitation is a kind of creation of images, however, as we affirm, and not of real things.
Theaet. Quite true.
Str. In the first place, there are two kinds of creation.
Theaet. What are they?
Str. One of them is human and the other divine.
Theaet. I do not follow.
Str. Every power, as you may remember our saying originally, which causes things to exist, not previously existing, was defined by us as creative.
Theaet. I remember.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-sophist.asp?pg=72
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -