|
Plato : PHILEBUS
Persons of the dialogue: Socrates - Protarchus - Philebus = Note by Elpenor |
79 Pages
Page 57
Soc. Is not envy an unrighteous pleasure, and also an unrighteous pain?
Pro. Most true.
Soc. There is nothing envious or wrong in rejoicing at the misfortunes of enemies?
Pro. Certainly not.
Soc. But to feel joy instead of sorrow at the sight of our friends' misfortunes - is not that wrong?
Pro. Undoubtedly.
Soc. Did we not say that ignorance was always an evil?
Pro. True.
Soc. And the three kinds of vain conceit in our friends which we enumerated - the vain conceit of beauty, of wisdom, and of wealth, are ridiculous if they are weak, and detestable when they are powerful: May we not say, as I was saying before, that our friends who are in this state of mind, when harmless to others, are simply ridiculous?
Pro. They are ridiculous.
Soc. And do we not acknowledge this ignorance of theirs to be a misfortune?
Pro. Certainly.
Soc. And do we feel pain or pleasure in laughing at it?
Pro. Clearly we feel pleasure.
Soc. And was not envy the source of this pleasure which we feel at the misfortunes of friends?
Pro. Certainly.
Soc. Then the argument shows that when we laugh at the folly of our friends, pleasure, in mingling with envy, mingles with pain, for envy has been acknowledged by us to be mental pain, and laughter is pleasant; and so we envy and laugh at the same instant.
Pro. True.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-philebus.asp?pg=57
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -