|
Plato : PHILEBUS
Persons of the dialogue: Socrates - Protarchus - Philebus = Note by Elpenor |
79 Pages
Page 22
Soc. And the finite or limit had not many divisions, and we ready acknowledged it to be by nature one?
Pro. Yes.
Soc. Yes, indeed; and when I speak of the third class, understand me to mean any offspring of these, being a birth into true being, effected by the measure which the limit introduces.
Pro. I understand.
Soc. Still there was, as we said, a fourth class to be investigated, and you must assist in the investigation; for does not everything which comes into being, of necessity come into being through a cause? Pro. Yes, certainly; for how can there be anything which has no cause?
Soc. And is not the agent the same as the cause in all except name; the agent and the cause may be rightly called one?
Pro. Very true.
Soc. And the same may be said of the patient, or effect; we shall find that they too differ, as I was saying, only in name - shall we not? Pro. We shall.
Soc. The agent or cause always naturally leads, and the patient or effect naturally follows it?
Pro. Certainly.
Soc. Then the cause and what is subordinate to it in generation are not the same, but different?
Pro. True.
Soc. Did not the things which were generated, and the things out of which they were generated, furnish all the three classes?
Pro. Yes.
Soc. And the creator or cause of them has been satisfactorily proven to be distinct from them - and may therefore be called a fourth principle?
Pro. So let us call it.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-greece/plato/plato-philebus.asp?pg=22
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -