Soc. And do you, Nicias, also acknowledge that the same science has
understanding of the same things, whether future, present, or past?
Nic. Yes, indeed Socrates; that is my opinion.
Soc. And courage, my friend, is, as you say, a knowledge of the fearful and of
the hopeful?
Nic. Yes.
Soc. And the fearful, and the hopeful, are admitted to be future goods and
future evils?
Nic. True.
Soc. And the same science has to do with the same things in the future or at
any time?
Nic. That is true.
Soc. Then courage is not the science which is concerned with the fearful and
hopeful, for they are future only; courage, like the other sciences, is
concerned not only with good and evil of the future, but of the present and
past, and of any time?
Nic. That, as I suppose, is true.
Soc. Then the answer which you have given, Nicias, includes only a third part
of courage; but our question extended to the whole nature of courage: and
according to your view, that is, according to your present view, courage is
not only the knowledge of the hopeful and the fearful, but seems to include
nearly every good and evil without reference to time. What do you say to that
alteration in your statement?
Plato Search ||| Aristotle
= Note
by 
