EGINNING with the
State, I replied, would you say that a city which is governed by a
tyrant is free or enslaved? No city, he said, can be more completely
enslaved. And yet, as you see, there are freemen as well as masters
in such a State? Yes, he said, I see that there are --a few; but the
people, speaking generally, and the best of them, are miserably
degraded and enslaved. Then if the man is like the State, I said,
must not the same rule prevail? his soul is full of meanness and
vulgarity --the best elements in him are enslaved; and there is a
small ruling part, which is also the worst and maddest. Inevitably.
And would you say that the soul of such an one is the soul of a
freeman, or of a slave? He has the soul of a slave, in my opinion.
And the State which is enslaved under a tyrant is utterly incapable
of acting voluntarily? Utterly incapable. And also the soul which is
under a tyrant (I am speaking of the soul taken as a whole) is least
capable of doing what she desires; there is a gadfly which goads
her, and she is full of trouble and remorse? Certainly. And is the
city which is under a tyrant rich or poor? Poor.