|
Plato : SOPHIST
Persons of the dialogue: Theodorus - Theaetetus - Socrates - an Eleatic stranger = Note by Elpenor |
77 Pages
Page 67
Str. I understand you to say that words which have a meaning when in sequence may be connected, but that words which have no meaning when in sequence cannot be connected?
Theaet. What are you saying?
Str. What I thought that you intended when you gave your assent; for there are two sorts of intimation of being which are given by the voice.
Theaet. What are they?
Str. One of them is called nouns, and the other verbs.
Theaet. Describe them.
Str. That which denotes action we call a verb.
Theaet. True.
Str. And the other, which is an articulate mark set on those who do the actions, we call a noun.
Theaet. Quite true.
Str. A succession of nouns only is not a sentence any more than of verbs without nouns.
Theaet. I do not understand you.
Str. I see that when you gave your assent you had something else in your mind. But what I intended to say was, that a mere succession of nouns or of verbs is not discourse.
Theaet. What do you mean?
Str. I mean that words like "walks," "runs," "sleeps," or any other words which denote action, however many of them you string together, do not make discourse.
Theaet. How can they?
Str. Or, again, when you say "lion," "stag," "horse," or any other words which denote agents - neither in this way of stringing words together do you attain to discourse; for there is no expression of action or inaction, or of the existence of existence or non - existence indicated by the sounds, until verbs are mingled with nouns; then the words fit, and the smallest combination of them forms language, and is the simplest and least form of discourse.
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-Greece/plato/plato-sophist.asp?pg=67
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -