|
Plato : PHILEBUS
Persons of the dialogue: Socrates - Protarchus - Philebus = Note by Elpenor |
79 Pages
Page 4
Soc. That is a return to the old position, Protarchus, and so we are to say (are we?) that there is no difference in pleasures, but that they are all alike; and the examples which have just been cited do not pierce our dull minds, but we go on arguing all the same, like the weakest and most inexperienced reasoners?
Pro. What do you mean?
Soc. Why, I mean to say, that in self - defence I may, if I like, follow your example, and assert boldly that the two things most unlike are most absolutely alike; and the result will be that you and I will prove ourselves to be very tyros in the art of disputing; and the argument will be blown away and lost. Suppose that we put back, and return to the old position; then perhaps we may come to an understanding with one another.
Pro. How do you mean?
Soc. Shall I, Protarchus, have my own question asked of me by you?
Pro. What question?
Soc. Ask me whether wisdom and science and mind, and those other qualities which I, when asked by you at first what is the nature of the good, affirmed to be good, are not in the same case with the pleasures of which you spoke.
Pro. What do you mean?
Soc. The sciences are a numerous class, and will be found to present great differences. But even admitting that, like the pleasures, they are opposite as well as different, should I be worthy of the name of dialectician if, in order to avoid this difficulty, I were to say (as you are saying of pleasure) that there is no difference between one science and another; - would not the argument founder and disappear like an idle tale, although we might ourselves escape drowning by clinging to a fallacy?
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-Greece/plato/plato-philebus.asp?pg=4
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -