|
Plato : PHAEDO
Persons of the dialogue: Phaedo - Echecrates Of Phlius - Socrates = Note by Elpenor |
This Part: 26 Pages
Part 2 Page 4
Then a harmony does not lead the parts or elements which make up the harmony, but only follows them.
He assented.
For harmony cannot possibly have any motion, or sound, or other quality which is opposed to the parts.
That would be impossible, he replied.
And does not every harmony depend upon the manner in which the elements are harmonized?
I do not understand you, he said.
I mean to say that a harmony admits of degrees, and is more of a harmony, and more completely a harmony, when more completely harmonized, if that be possible; and less of a harmony, and less completely a harmony, when less harmonized.
True.
But does the soul admit of degrees? or is one soul in the very least degree more or less, or more or less completely, a soul than another? Not in the least.
Yet surely one soul is said to have intelligence and virtue, and to be good, and another soul is said to have folly and vice, and to be an evil soul: and this is said truly?
Yes, truly.
But what will those who maintain the soul to be a harmony say of this presence of virtue and vice in the soul? - Will they say that there is another harmony, and another discord, and that the virtuous soul is harmonized, and herself being a harmony has another harmony within her, and that the vicious soul is inharmonical and has no harmony within her?
I cannot say, replied Simmias; but I suppose that something of that kind would be asserted by those who take this view.
And the admission is already made that no soul is more a soul than another; and this is equivalent to admitting that harmony is not more or less harmony, or more or less completely a harmony?
Quite true.
Phaedo part 1 of 2. You are at part 2
Plato Home Page / Bilingual Anthology Plato Search ||| Aristotle
Reference address : https://ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/ancient-Greece/plato/plato-phaedo-2.asp?pg=4
Copyright : Elpenor 2006 -