Ath. What truth and what justice require of us, if I am not mistaken, when
speaking in behalf of divine excellence; - at the legislator when making his
laws had in view not a part only, and this the lowest part of virtue, but all
virtue, and that he devised classes of laws answering to the kinds of virtue;
not in the way in which modern inventors of laws make the classes, for they
only investigate and offer laws whenever a want is felt, and one man has a
class of laws about allotments and heiresses, another about assaults; others
about ten thousand other such matters. But we maintain that the right way of
examining into laws is to proceed as we have now done, and I admired the
spirit of your exposition; for you were quite right in beginning with virtue,
and saying that this was the aim of the giver of the law, but I thought that
you went wrong when you added that all his legislation had a view only to a
part, and the least part of virtue, and this called forth my subsequent
remarks. Will you allow me then to explain how I should have liked to have
heard you expound the matter?